Navigation – Plan du site

AccueilAbstracta IranicaVolume 32-333. Histoire, Art et Archéologie, ...3.2. Ouest de l’Iran3.2.3. Séleucides, Parthes et Sas...Dominique Hollard. Julien et Mith...

3. Histoire, Art et Archéologie, Période pré-Islamique
3.2. Ouest de l’Iran
3.2.3. Séleucides, Parthes et Sassanides
171

Dominique Hollard. Julien et Mithrā sur le relief de Tāq-e-Bostān

Bruno Overlaet
Référence(s) :

Dominique Hollard. « Julien et Mithrā sur le relief de Tāq-e-Bostān », in : R. Gyselen, ed., Sources for the History of Sasanian and Post-Sasanian Iran. Bures-sur-Yvette, 2010, p. 147-163. (Res Orientalis XIX)

Texte intégral

1The author examines the reasons for the presence of Julianus Apostata and Mithra together on the investiture relief of Ardashir II at Taq-i Bustan. Roman literary and numismatic sources serve to illustrate Julianus Apostata’s syncretic religious background, his relation to the Mithraic cult and the significance of the celestial bull on his coins. Although this combination of Sol-Helios-Mithra differs, as the author shows, in many ways from the Persian Mithra, it is suggested that the Persian nobility considered Julianus’ use of it as an offensive attempt to establish divine rights to the Persian realm, even more so since Hormisdas, a brother of Shapur II who took part in the Roman invasion, was to be placed on the Persian throne. Mithra is depicted to back Julianus’ invalid claims to divine support, an idea first suggested by O. Nicholson (“Taq-i Bostan, Mithras and Julian the Apostate: an irony”, Iranica Antiqua XVIII, 1983:177-178). To account for the presence of a Roman emperor who was defeated in 363 on the relief of Ardashir who came to power in 379, Hollard likens the fallen emperor to Ahriman, while comparing the relief with the investiture of Ardashir I at Naqsh-i Rustam. He proposes seeing the investing figure as Ohrmazd. Because the latter stands on the fallen Julianus Apostata, the scene would symbolize the defeat of evil. Contrary to the statement on p. 157 however, Ardashir II also stands on the Roman emperor. P. Calmeyer explained this in terms of the role of Ardashir II in the defeat of Julianus Apostata. His paper has bearing on the present discussion (“Vom Reisehut zur Kaiserkrone: B. Stand der archäologischen Forschung zu den iranischen Kronen”, Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, Neue Folge 10, 1977, p. 187-188; see, too, A. Shahbazi, “Studies in Sasanian Prosopography - II. The Relief of Ardašer II at Taq-i Bustān”, Archaeologische Mitteilungen aus Iran, Neue Folge 18, 1985, p. 181-185, Taf. 51).

Haut de page

Pour citer cet article

Référence électronique

Bruno Overlaet, « Dominique Hollard. Julien et Mithrā sur le relief de Tāq-e-Bostān »Abstracta Iranica [En ligne], Volume 32-33 | 2013, document 171, mis en ligne le 01 juillet 2016, consulté le 28 mars 2024. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/abstractairanica/40515 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/abstractairanica.40515

Haut de page

Rédacteur

Bruno Overlaet

Royal Museums of Art and History, Bruxelles

Comptes rendus du même rédacteur

Haut de page

Droits d’auteur

Le texte et les autres éléments (illustrations, fichiers annexes importés), sont « Tous droits réservés », sauf mention contraire.

Haut de page
Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search